Photograph: Christophe Petit Tesson/EPA |
‘By comparison to what it could have been, it’s a miracle. By
comparison to what it should have been, it’s a disaster.’
This is
how the Guardian summarised the Paris UN Climate
talks, and I would say that I hold a fairly similar opinion. It cannot be
denied that this is a momentous and pivotal moment in the development of
international climate policy, and worthy of the jubilant scenes witnessed. Most
notably, the undertaking of the initial commitments to reduce carbon emissions
by 180 countries and the legally binding aspect of the climate fund, appear to
be huge steps in the right direction.
However,
whilst this outcome is no doubt progressive, the commitment to a maximum of 2
degrees warming is still incredibly high, and could render large areas of the
world uninhabitable by 2100. Additionally, as it stands currently, the actual
set emission targets will only limit warming to 2.7 degrees Celsius, still a
long way above the original, and now seemingly unobtainable, 1.5 degree target.
In terms
of the relation to this blogs' headline topic; migrants were ‘acknowledged’
within the document as having their human rights affected by
climate change, but there was no direct discussion of policy regarding this.
Indirectly, a number of the influential migration push factors that I have
discussed (rising sea levels, drought risk, food insecurity) would be greatly
improved if these new targets are kept to and further improved upon. However,
depending on how the migration issue develops over the coming years, more
specific ‘climate migrant’ policies may become a necessity at future
conferences.
Hopefully
the UK government will carry forward this momentum into 2016 and adopt an
energy strategy more sufficient in meeting these ambitious carbon budgets in a
cost effective and timely manner. In spite of DECC’s very positive contribution
to climate policy over the years, the government’s recent energy policy has
been a little more controversial. Scrapping zero-carbon targets and reductions
in the level of support available for renewable initiatives have culminated in
a somewhat embarrassing ‘downgrading’ of the energy efficiency rating of the UK, and
are not conducive to achieving the targets set out during COP21.
Refreshing take on the outcome, Kat.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the final agreement left a lot to be desired - particularly specific deadlines by which emissions must be cut.