In a
number of the previously discussed case studies, food security may have been a significant
instigator of societal disruption. Particularly in the case of the Mayan
example, a failure of their irrigation systems heavily decreased agricultural
production. In a more recent example, as I explained in my very first post, the
Syrian refugee crisis is thought to have been partially initiated by drought
and consequential crop failure; a highly contentious proposal which Charlotte Church and Prince Charles, have become the unlikely advocates for. Tackling
hunger has been described as ‘one the greatest challenges of our time’ by Wheeler and
Braun (2013), and something which is expected to be complicated
by numerous interrelated climate change risks in the near future.
Rising
temperatures, precipitation changes, and an increase in the frequency and
severity of extreme weather events are just a few of the expected implications
of climate change; all of which may directly interrupt agricultural
production. Hanjra and Qureshi (2010) propose that changes to water supply and demand
will most significantly impact upon crop productivity, but increased flooding
and land loss will also be influential. However, the effects of this food
insecurity is not expected to be felt equally around the world. As discussed
by Wheeler and Braun (2013), the ‘fertiliser effect’, created by an
increase in atmospheric carbon may intensify crop yields in some countries.
However, a net negative impact for poorer nations is predicted, with rising
temperatures excepted to decrease food production closer to the equator. Almost
all of the countries in the ‘alarming’ category for food insecurity, as set by
the UN Food and Agricultural Organisation, are in sub-Saharan Africa. This
geographical distribution in the prevalence hunger is predicted to become even more divergent in a warming
climate, with those in South East Asia and Africa expected to feel this
insecurity to the greatest degree.
In addition to generating numerous deleterious effects, food security is thought to intensify internal rural-urban migration, as individuals attempt to reduce their vulnerability. If we consider Syria; rapid urbanisation was proposed to have exacerbated a number of pre-existing factors already contributing to unrest. These poorer countries expected to be disproportionately effected by future insecurity, are perhaps also more likely to suffer from enhanced vulnerability from other sources. Thus, this is a situation which may play out multiple times in a warming climate scenario.
Cross-border
migration is also likely to increase, and is similarly recognised as a method
of trying to manage this risk. When a study by the Southern African Migration
programme looked
at international migration, they found that 74% of migrant sending households
received remittances. Of these households, 93% predominantly spent this money
on food and groceries, with no other category coming remotely close. It is
possible that those in the affected areas, may become even more reliant on
international migration in the future.
There is
also the possibility that migration itself may be the cause of food insecurity.
For example, if we look at Bangladesh, a country incredibly susceptible to flooding;
future events may push an increasing number of people over the border, and into
neighbouring India. Not only would this put a strain on the current resources
within the country, but when you consider the fact that global warming is
predicted to cause a 40% decrease in the agricultural capacity of India by
2040, continued influxes may push India into a more food insecure state than
they would have otherwise been in.
Climate
change will not be the only factor effecting food production, nor will
migration be the only response. However, there do seem to be a number of
interrelated cause and effect relationships within this. A more detailed
understanding of these relationships will be imperative in developing
appropriate adaptation and mitigation strategies for food insecurity, which
will undoubtedly continue to impact upon a huge percentage of the global
population.
No comments:
Post a Comment